Theory Building and the Evolution of the Discipline
How theories are built, and why approaches do not replace each other in a simple sequence.
A theory explains a relationship
A theory connects concepts to explain a pattern under stated conditions. It differs from a description, which records what exists, and from a recommendation, which says what ought to be done. The same discussion can contain all three, but they should not be confused.
For example, saying that a department has many levels describes its structure. Arguing that additional clearances delay decisions because information must pass through each level proposes a mechanism. Recommending fewer levels is a design choice that must also consider supervision, risk and workload. A good theory identifies conditions and evidence that could show the explanation is mistaken.
| Explanatory turn | Problem brought into focus | Continuing limitation |
|---|---|---|
| Classical and scientific management | Work methods structure specialisation and coordination. | Formal design cannot explain all motivation power or context. |
| Human relations | Informal groups morale and social relationships. | Cooperation and harmony may conceal conflict or unequal power. |
| Behavioural and decision approaches | Actual choices information limits and individual behaviour. | Describing decisions does not determine desirable public goals. |
| Comparative and ecological approaches | Variation across political social and cultural settings. | Broad contextual models still require testable concepts and evidence. |
| Development administration | Administration for planned social and economic change. | Targets can become technocratic or insufficiently participatory. |
| Value and governance approaches | Equity public purposes participation performance and interdependence. | The approaches emphasise different values and cannot be collapsed into one model. |
A focused orientation to later approaches
New Public Administration challenged the idea that efficiency alone was sufficient and foregrounded relevance, values and social equity. Dwight Waldo was a public administration scholar associated with the 1968 Minnowbrook conference; H George Frederickson developed the social-equity emphasis. Public Choice applies incentive reasoning to political and administrative actors. New Public Management emphasises managerial autonomy, competition and performance. Good governance evaluates the quality of governing through criteria such as accountability, participation and legality. These are introductory distinctions, not complete notes on each approach.
Why there is no simple replacement sequence
The approaches coexist because they explain different dimensions. A contemporary office can retain hierarchy, use performance targets, depend on informal cooperation and deliver services through a network. Later theories often correct omissions in earlier accounts without making every earlier insight obsolete.
Theory-building is difficult because public organisations have different purposes, operate in different contexts and face contested values. This supports conditional explanations and comparative inquiry. It does not mean administrative experience cannot be studied systematically.
Does the existence of many administrative theories show that the discipline has failed?
Answer direction Distinguish intellectual diversity from conceptual confusion. Assess whether each theory has a clear question mechanism scope and evidential basis.
Previous: Note 4: Wilson and the Emergence of Administrative Study | Next: Note 6: LPG and the Changing Administrative Role
π£ Join our community